Oxford v. Hamilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of plaintiffs alcoholism admissible in personal injury action to assist in determining life expectancy and awarding damages for loss of future earnings
• blood test not protected by privilege, based on Arkansas’ construction of Uniform Rules of Evidence and the term “confidential communication.”
• blood test results not confidential communication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).