Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that court may, not correct even “grave error” of arbitrator and stating that arbitrator’s construction of contract “holds, however good, bad, or ugly”
• holding that in deciding whether to vacate an arbitration award “the sole question for [the court] is whether the arbitrator (even arguably) interpreted the parties’ contract, not whether he got its meaning right or wrong”
• noting that “convincing a court of an arbitrator’s error—even his grave error—is not enough” to justify vacatur
• noting that “convincing a court of an arbitrator’s error—even his grave error—is not enough” to justify vacatur
• noting that “convincing a court of an arbitrator’s error—even his grave error—is not enough” to justify vacatur
• noting that a court may review de novo an arbitrator’s arbi-trability determination absent clear evidence that the parties wanted the arbitrator to decide the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).