Oxendine v. Louisiana Ry. & Navigation Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the ALJ properly rejected checkbox portions of a doctor’s opinion because there was no explanation for these findings and they were contradicted by the doctor’s own assessment that the claimant had only mild or moderate limitations for mental functioning
• affirming ALJ’s rejection of medical opinions which were unexplained and unsupported by the record
• “The ALJ properly rejected Dr. Spurling's opinions relating to Plaintiff's ability to perform full-time work and absences as unsupported by the record.”
• “[p]laintiff’s argument is based on a mischaracterization of the record[;] . . . based on [the doctor’s] assessment that [p]laintiff has moderate limitations (meaning unable to function eleven to twenty-five percent of the time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).