Owsley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Article 92, UCMJ, conviction sustained as long as limited to Article 86, UCMJ —failure to go to appointed place of duty— maximum punishment
• “apprehension” of escalated punishments via Article 90, UCMJ, for preexisting duties “is of no import, and indeed, is irrelevant when the offense is charged under Article 92, due to the sentence restriction applicable thereto found in footnote 5 of the Table of Maximum Punishments . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).