Owners Insurance v. Clayton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• clarifying that insurance policy exclusions are construed “most strongly against the insurance company, which also bears the burden of establishing the exclusion’s applicability”
• stating a motion to reconsider, alter, or amend judgment under Rule 59(e
• insurer who defended insured to general verdict had to cover entire judgment because at least one claim was covered
• “the term ‘arising out of’ when used in an insurance policy exclusion should be narrowly construed to mean ‘caused by.’”
• “[S]ince the Clayton jury returned a general verdict, a finding that any of the three claims submitted to that jury is not excluded answers the coverage question.”
• “Insurance policy exclusions are construed most strongly against the insurance company-”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).