Skip to main content
· 7/1/1816

Owings v. Ulery

Citations

  • 7 Ky. 450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • taking judicial notice of “plaintiff's IDHR and EEOC charges attached to defendants’ motion as well as IDHR records submitted by the parties”
  • \plaintiff cannot rely on the EEOC right to sue letters that she received to establish a right to sue under the IHRA\
  • “[A] right to sue letter from the EEOC does not serve as a substitute for a final order from the [IDHR].” (second alteration in original) (quoting Jimenez, 264 F. Supp. 2d at 695)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Owseey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.