· 7/1/1816
Owings v. Ulery
Citations
- 7 Ky. 450
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- taking judicial notice of “plaintiff's IDHR and EEOC charges attached to defendants’ motion as well as IDHR records submitted by the parties”
- \plaintiff cannot rely on the EEOC right to sue letters that she received to establish a right to sue under the IHRA\
- “[A] right to sue letter from the EEOC does not serve as a substitute for a final order from the [IDHR].” (second alteration in original) (quoting Jimenez, 264 F. Supp. 2d at 695)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Owseey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.