Owings v. Anderson County Sheriff's Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that where substantial evidence supported finding claimant’s heart problems were not causally related to his employment activities, there was no error in concluding the injury did not arise out of his admittedly physically demanding job training
• recognizing the “special errand” exception to the “going and coming rule”
• “in the course of’ refers to the time, place, and circumstances under which the accident occurred, while “arising out of’ requires a causative connection between employment and the cause of the accident
• \in the course of\ refers to the time, place, and circumstances under which the accident occurred, while \arising out of\ requires a causative connection between employment and the cause of the accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).