Owens v. Ousey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that requirement in section 202.003(a) of the property code to liberally construe restrictive covenants did not change analysis of unambiguous provision that restrictive covenants were in effect for 25-year period
• holding that requirement in section 202.003(a) of the property code to liberally construe restrictive covenants did not change analysis of unambiguous provision that restrictive covenants were in effect for 25-year period
• remanding because evidence of attorney’s fees for en tire case is some evidence of what amount of segregated fees should be
• remanding because evidence of attorney's fees for entire case is some evidence of what amount of segregated fees should be
• remanding because evidence of attorney’s fees for entire case is some evidence of what amount of segregated fees should be
• UDJA \cannot be used as a vehicle for defendants to obtain attorney's fees merely for resisting the plaintiff's right to recover\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).