· 6/30/1994
Owens v. Motor Vehicles Division
Citations
- 875 P.2d 463
- 319 Or. 259
- 1994 Ore. LEXIS 57
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the legislature’s authorization of particular challenges to the proper administration of a Breathalyzer test implies a legislative intent to exclude other kinds of challenges
- holding that the legislature's authorization of particular challenges to the proper administration of a Breathalyzer test implies a legislative intent to exclude other kinds of challenges
- considering testimony by legal counsel to senate committee on effect of the bill
- a statute is ambiguous if capable of more than one interpretation that is not \wholly implausible\
- a statute is ambiguous if capable of more than one interpretation that is not “wholly implausible”
- in first level of analysis in statutory construction, court considers the context of the statutory provision at issue, including other provisions of the same and related statutes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis, Graber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.