Owens v. Kings Supermarket

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “the defendant supermarket did not, as a matter of law, owe a duty to a customer who was injured by the negligence of a third party on an adjacent public street”
• supermarket owed no duty to customer injured by negligence of third party in public street adjacent to supermarket premises
• supermarket owed no duty to customer injured by negligence of third party in public street adjacent to supermarket premises
• store had no duty to customer injured on adjacent street

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).