· 4/3/1995
Owens v. Best Beers of Bloomington, Inc.
Citations
- 648 N.E.2d 699
- 1995 Ind. App. LEXIS 355
- 1995 WL 138975
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that questions concerning the assistance provided in an underlying suit was not subject to the attorney-client privilege
- “The burden to prove the applicability of the privilege is on the one who asserts it.”
- defendant could not prevent the disclosure of a compensation arrangement between itself and plaintiff merely because it was discussed in the presence of defendant’s attorney
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sharpnack, Kirsch, Rucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.