Skip to main content
· 4/3/1995

Owens v. Best Beers of Bloomington, Inc.

Citations

  • 648 N.E.2d 699
  • 1995 Ind. App. LEXIS 355
  • 1995 WL 138975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that questions concerning the assistance provided in an underlying suit was not subject to the attorney-client privilege
  • “The burden to prove the applicability of the privilege is on the one who asserts it.”
  • defendant could not prevent the disclosure of a compensation arrangement between itself and plaintiff merely because it was discussed in the presence of defendant’s attorney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack, Kirsch, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.