Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Meade

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that risk of inconsistent interpretations of arbitration clause by different tribunals merited adjudication of entire case before one court
• holding that non-diverse parties in an underlying state action who were omitted from a petition to compel arbitration but subject to the same arbitration provision were necessary parties
• holding that possibility that one court might compel arbitration while the other court might allow alternative judicial remedies to some of the plaintiffs warranted having one court adjudicate the entire case with all of the affected parties before it
• holding that possibility that one court might compel arbitration while the other court might allow alternative judicial remedies to some of the plaintiffs warranted having one court adjudicate the entire case with all of the affected parties before it
• noting that joinder is not feasible in a diversity case if the required party would destroy diversity jurisdiction
• noting that joinder is not feasible in a diversity case if the required party would destroy diversity jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).