Skip to main content
· 5/7/2002

Owens Ex Rel. Schafer v. American Home Prod.

Citations

  • 203 F. Supp. 2d 748
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8552
  • 2002 WL 992094

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in a case preceding Moss, the court held that although thimerosal claims were vaccine-related, the manufacturers who supplied thimerosal to vaccine manufacturers, but did not manufacture the vaccine, were not subject to the Vaccine Act
  • parents of injured children “need not (and cannot, for that matter) file a Program petition with respect to their Individual Claims, and are consequently permitted to file such claims in this forum”
  • in a case preceding Moss, the court held that although thimerosal claims were vaccine-related, the manufacturers who supplied thimerosal to vaccine manufacturers, but did not manufacture the vaccine, were not subject to the Vaccine Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kent

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.