Owens Corning v. Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statute did not violate article III, section 56 for the same rea sons it did not violate the Equal Protection Clause
• recognizing the Legislature’s legitimate interest in preventing forum-shopping through retroactive application of an amendment to the forum non conveniens statute
• observing that “[considerations of fair notice, reasonable reliance, and settled expectations play a prominent role” when determining rights entitled to constitutional protection
• recognizing that courts may make reasoned adjustments in legal system
• providing that showing that no such rational relation exists is one “element” of a challenge based on these constitutional provisions
• recognizing that courts may make reasoned adjustments in legal system

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).