· 8/26/1994
Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. James
Citations
- 646 So. 2d 669
- 1994 Ala. LEXIS 413
- 1994 WL 460572
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that this Court will not review an adverse ruling on a motion in limine, absent proper objection at trial or the trial court's express agreement that such an objection is not necessary
- explaining the necessity of renewing during trial a motion in limine that has either not been ruled on or has been denied, unless the trial court has expressly stated that no renewal of the motion in limine is required
- explaining the necessity of renewing during trial a motion in limine that has either not been ruled on or has been denied, unless the trial court has expressly stated that no renewal of the motion in limine is required
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Houston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.