Owen v. Matsumoto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the proper procedure for review of a sentence miscalculation claim is to request post-conviction relief under Criminal Rule 35.1
• recognizing inmates' right to judicial review of Department of Corrections’ administrative decisions affecting fundamental constitutional rights
• “Any alleged violation of fundamental constitutional rights must be afforded judicial review. However, Owen has not shown that review by administrative appeal is the proper avenue for judicial review of an alleged miscalculation of his sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).