Skip to main content
· 5/16/1910

Owen v. Dudley & Michener

Citations

  • 217 U.S. 488
  • 30 S. Ct. 602
  • 54 L. Ed. 851
  • 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1975

Syllabus

<p>In this case a contract made by the attorney of record with associate .counsel for professional services to be paid out cf fee:, in an- Indian litigation in the Court of Claims construed; and, although -the contract provided that in case the fees were not provided for by legislation but had to be proved each party should prove, his fee indo pendently, held, that as the attorney of record had coliooted without legislation the entire fee originally contemplated and allowable he must account for the amount so collected by him and pay the associate counsel the amount agreed under the contract.</p> <p>31 App. D. C. 177, affirmed.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • agreement between Indian tribe and attorneys to pursue claims
  • agreement between Indian tribe and attorneys to pursue claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKenna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.