Owen v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a treating physician’s opinion is not entitled to controlling weight, the ALJ must consider several factors when assessing the weight to give it
• holding that when a treating physician’s opinion is not entitled to controlling weight, the ALJ must consider several factors to determine the amount of weight given to the opinion
• holding that when a treating physician’s opinion is not entitled to controlling weight, the ALJ must consider several factors to determine the amount of weight given to the opinion
• holding ALJ did not err by omitting medication drowsiness from RFC where no evidence suggested side effects were uncontrollable or restricted claimant’s ability to work
• holding ALJ did not err by omitting medication drowsiness from RFC where no evidence suggested side effects were uncontrollable or restricted claimant’s ability to work
• rejecting a physician’s opinion because the claimant’s activities of daily living did not reflect the limitations found in the opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).