Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1/24/1973
Overton v. State
Citations
- 490 S.W.2d 556
- 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2677
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that where a witness testifies that an item appears to be the same item taken during an offense, the proper predicate is laid for admission of that item into evidence
- noting that where a witness testifies that an item appears to be the same item taken during an offense, the proper predicate is laid for admission of that item into evidence
- “It should be stressed that the [best evidence] rule applies only where the purpose of the offered evidence is to prove the contents of the document.”
- “It should be stressed that the [best evidence] rule applies only where the purpose of the offered evidence is to prove the contents of the document.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-03-27· cited 418×
- Gholson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-10-20· cited 117×
- Henriksen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-10-17· cited 101×
- Curtis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-03-12· cited 80×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-04-24· cited 67×
- Nelson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-02-06· cited 50×
- Yanez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-09-26· cited 44×
- Latham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-09-14· cited 39×
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-05-28· cited 37×
- Navajar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-06-20· cited 35×
- Poore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-06-18· cited 27×
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-02-19· cited 21×
- Urbano v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1988-10-27· cited 20×
- Cook v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1992-04-22· cited 13×
- Kessler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-10-09· cited 9×
- Casiano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-05-30· cited 8×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1981-11-11· cited 8×
- State v. Baldemar ChaveraTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2012-10-17· cited 6×
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-01-16· cited 5×
- Keane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1984-08-30· cited 5×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gordon v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1953-02-02· cited 306×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-04-19· cited 112×
- Bellah v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1967-04-26· cited 51×
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Missouri· 1969-04-14· cited 47×
- Cage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1958-05-28· cited 43×
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-01-26· cited 38×
- Hefley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-01-10· cited 29×
- Chapin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1958-11-12· cited 25×
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-04-26· cited 22×
- Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1965-10-13· cited 22×
- Ex Parte MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1968-11-06· cited 16×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-03-22· cited 13×
- Holding v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-12-02· cited 10×
- Reyna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-03-15· cited 6×
- Biggerstaff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1927-12-14· cited 3×
- Burrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-11-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.