Overton v. Overton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a 12 plaintiff asserting a conspiracy claim under section 1983 must show a constitutional deprivation
• dismissing Bane Act claim for failure to allege specific intent or facts that 23 specific intent could reasonably be inferred
• dismissing Bane 8 Act claim against county based on claim presentation requirement and then dismissing 9 public employee
• “[P]rosecutorial immunity bars allegations for, among other things, malicious prosecution and conspiracy in connection with criminal prosecutions.”
• Government 10 Claims Act compliance required for claims under California Bane Civil Rights Act, Cal. Gov’t 11 Code 52.1
• “[W]hen a pleading fails to allege what role each Defendant played in the alleged harm, 3 this makes it exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, for individual Defendants to respond to 4 Plaintiffs’ allegations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).