Skip to main content
· 6/8/2005

Overstreet v. United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America, Local Union No. 1506

Citations

  • 409 F.3d 1199
  • 177 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2513
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 10596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remarking that since regional directors determine whether to file Section 10(i) petitions such filings “suggest[] nothing about how the Board will ultimately resolve the case”
  • “To say that Miller applies to this case does not ... fully delineate the applicable standards for judging the propriety of the requested interim relief ... because of the First Amendment backdrop in this case.”
  • “Ordinarily, a three-judge panel ‘may not overrule a prior decision of the court.’ ” (quoting Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 899 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.