Overstreet Grain Co. v. Ford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding an agency took a hard look at environmental impacts when the site-specific EIS was tiered to another EIS
• “The DOE accepts [the CEQ regulations] as binding, as do we for purposes of this appeal.”
• “The DOE accepts [the CEQ regulations] as binding, as do we for purposes of this appeal.”
• “[Courts] apply the APA’s arbitrary and capricious standard to a NEPA challenge.”
• hardship does not “flow from the uncertainty of the [agency’s] implementation of the plan” where the plan “does not command anyone to do anything,” “refrain from doing anything,” or have any “adverse effects of a strictly legal kind” (cleaned up)
• quot- ing 42 U.S.C. § 4332(2)(C)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).