· 11/10/2011
Overly v. Keybank National Ass'n
Citations
- 662 F.3d 856
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 22651
- 94 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,323
- 113 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1345
- 2011 WL 5505338
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the plaintiff’s violation of company policy was a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for issuing a formal warning and a fine
- ruling no harassment claim when supervisor called plaintiff “cutie” five to ten times over two months
- ruling no harassment claim when supervisor called plaintiff “cutie” five to ten times over two months
- ruling no harassment claim when supervisor called plaintiff “cutie” five to ten times over two months
- observing that facts suggesting a supervisor does not like an employee do not necessarily support the inference that the supervisor does not like the employee for a discriminatory reason
- affirming summary judgment because plaintiff failed \to show that [her employer] took any adverse action against her because of her complaint\ (emphasis in original)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Conley, Evans, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.