Skip to main content
· 11/10/2011

Overly v. Keybank National Ass'n

Citations

  • 662 F.3d 856
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 22651
  • 94 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,323
  • 113 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1345
  • 2011 WL 5505338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiff’s violation of company policy was a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for issuing a formal warning and a fine
  • ruling no harassment claim when supervisor called plaintiff “cutie” five to ten times over two months
  • ruling no harassment claim when supervisor called plaintiff “cutie” five to ten times over two months
  • ruling no harassment claim when supervisor called plaintiff “cutie” five to ten times over two months
  • observing that facts suggesting a supervisor does not like an employee do not necessarily support the inference that the supervisor does not like the employee for a discriminatory reason
  • affirming summary judgment because plaintiff failed \to show that [her employer] took any adverse action against her because of her complaint\ (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conley, Evans, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.