Skip to main content
· 11/8/1960

Overlock v. Ruedemann

Citations

  • 147 Conn. 649
  • 165 A.2d 335
  • 1960 Conn. LEXIS 198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that no relevant public policy consideration “prevents an uneman-cipated minor from recovering damages for the negligence of [plaintiffs] unemanci-pated minor brother or sister”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldwin, King, Mukphy, Mellitz, Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.