Overholt v. Vieths

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that result obviated need to address remaining arguments
• permitting expert testimony on the possibility of false memory implantation in children through improper and suggestive interview techniques
• permitting expert testimony on the possibility of false memory implantation in children through improper and suggestive interview techniques
• appealing party must demonstrate, in part, that error prejudiced party’s case
• “Instead, we agree with those jurisdictions that find that the proper protocols and techniques used to interview child victim witnesses is a matter not within the knowledge and understanding of the average juror.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).