Overhead Door Corporation and Gmi Holdings, Inc. v. The Chamberlain Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the “patentees’ representation to the Patent and Trademark Office in its . . . sworn declaration indicated their intent to include the algorithm of Figure 3 as a ‘cor- responding structure’ for the switch means”
• “Literal infringement of a claim requires that every limitation recited in the claim appear in the accused device, i.e., that the properly construed claim reads on the accused device exactly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).