· 1/23/1976
Ove Skou v. United States
Citations
- 526 F.2d 293
- 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 13183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Most clear ... is the proof that [the vessel] was in immediate demand, as were her sister ships, upon her return to service. This demonstrates ‘that profits may be reasonably supposed to have been lost because the vessel was active in a ready market.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tuttle, Thornberry, Clark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.