Outlaw v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The responsibility for evaluating the adequacy of the showing of [unavailability] rests with the trial judge, and his determination of this issue will not be disturbed unless an abuse of discretion clearly appears.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jackson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-18· cited 152×
• Pope v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-10-27· cited 128×
• Reynolds v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-05-18· cited 98×
• Stano v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-07-11· cited 65×
• Muehleman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2009-02-19· cited 32×
• Spicer v. Metropolitan Dade County
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-16· cited 9×
• Wilson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-22· cited 1×
• Outlaw v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-02-06
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-03-04

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blackwell v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1920-05-10· cited 48×
• Putnal v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1908-06-15· cited 44×
• Richardson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-04-21· cited 28×
• Young v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1923-03-15· cited 25×
• People v. Franquelin
  California Court of Appeal· 1952-03-17· cited 22×
• Davis v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1960-12-02· cited 22×
• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1953-05-19· cited 14×
• James v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-12-02· cited 7×
• Dorman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1904-06-15· cited 4×