Skip to main content

Outlaw v. Chater

Citations

  • 921 F. Supp. 13
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4068
  • 1996 WL 159464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the fees charged by a consultant for preparation of pleadings could be recovered, if at all, only under the attorney fee provisions of EAJA
  • finding counsel is not entitled to fees for work done before the SSA prior to filing the Complaint or for work done during remand to the SSA if remanded under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
  • “section 406(b) does not provide for the award of costs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles R. Richey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Outlaw v. Chater

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.