Skip to main content
· 1/15/1878

Outhouse v. Outhouse

Citations

  • 20 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 130

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that, once the matter of payment or receipt of workers' compensation benefits was put before a jury in a case in which it has no relevance ”[c]orrective instructions had little chance to get this idea out of the jurors’ minds”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mullin, Smith, Talcott, Taloott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.