Ourfalian v. Aro Manufacturing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal of common law wrongful termination claim because the “statutes upon which the plaintiff relies for public policy pronouncements contain recognized and comprehensive sanctions”
• reversing Superior Court summary judgment in favor of employer on c. 152, §75B(2) claim
• all inferences should be drawn in the plaintiffs favor, and the complaint “is to be construed so as to do substantial justice . . .”
• All inferences should be drawn in the plaintiffs favor, and the complaint “is to be construed so as to do substantial justice . . .”
• All inferences should be drawn in the plaintiff s favor, and the complaint “is to be construed so as to do substantial justice . . .”
• although plaintiff had filed no compensation claim by time of discharge, the complaint aUeged that the employer had fired several other employees for filing such claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).