Oullahan v. Sweeney
Citations
- 79 Cal. 537
- 21 P. 960
- 1889 Cal. LEXIS 765
Syllabus
<p>Tax Sale — Redemption — Effect of Act of 1885 Requiring Notice to the Owner of the Purchaser’s Application for a Deed — Extension of Time for Redemption. — The act of 1885, requiring the purchaser at a tax sale to give to the owner thirty days’ notice of the application for a deed, and extending the time for redemption until such notice is given, is constitutional, and applies to all applications for deeds made after the act took effect.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming trial court’s finding that appellant understood enough English to knowingly and voluntarily waive his Miranda rights when video recording of in-custody interview supported the trial court’s con- clusion
- where charge as a whole fairly represented the issue of justification failure to use certain words in charge presents no ground for reversal
- where charge as a whole fairly represented the issue of justification failure to use certain words in charge presents no ground for reversal
- appellant’s allegation that trial court gave erroneous jury charge on justified use of force was without merit where the charge as a whole was not an incorrect statement of the law and fairly represented the issue of justification
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hayne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.