Skip to main content

Ouellette v. Ouellette

Citations

  • 152 N.E.3d 528
  • 2020 Ohio 705

Syllabus

Judgment affirmed, in part and reversed in part, where trial court had jurisdiction to consider 60(B) motion for relief from judgment, and did not abuse its discretion in finding a timely motion demonstrating a meritorious defense and mutual mistake, but lacked authority to modify the property order by changing the source of the lump sum payment, with remand necessary to consider appropriate remedy under Civ.R. 60(B).

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.