Ouachita Watch League v. Jacobs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a party may raise a jurisdictional issue for the first time on appeal
• noting that, because the statute at issue did not provide for a private right of action, any challenge to agency action must be brought under the APA
• allowing supplementation where the 23 “additional material would be dispositive of pending issues in the case”
• applying Ohio Forestry and concluding that challenges to several environmental impact statements were ripe
• “[T]he plaintiffs were harmed when their procedural rights under NEPA were violated. Since the Forest Service (according to Ouachita
• “A case is moot when the issues no longer involve a live controversy with respect to which the court can give meaningful relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).