Otts v. Brough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the trial court’s adjudications underlying a defendant dismissed on appeal did not create “law of the case” for purposes of the remaining defendant on appeal
• note, however, that the Otts opinion was specifically concerned with an opposing party’s depositions rather than his affidavits
• note, however, that the Otts opinion was specifically concerned with an opposing party's depositions rather than his affidavits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).