Otto v. Charles T. Miller Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that hospital did not abuse its privilege by disseminating slanderous statement about employee suspected of starting fires in the course of an arson investigation
• holding that the employer had a qualified privilege to communicate the reason for an employee's discharge in front of a union representative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).