Otto H. Lizut v. Department of the Army

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that, because it is OPM’s responsibility to determine entitlement to disability retirement benefits, the evidence need not uncontrovertibly establish a disabling condition before the employing agency is obligated to apply for the appellant
• “Allowing a party to withhold important issues from the board and later present them to this court would undermine the board’s authority.”
• “Allowing a party to withhold im- portant issues from the [B]oard and later present them to this court would undermine the [B]oard’s authority.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).