Skip to main content
· 1/5/1988

Otter Tail Power Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

Citations

  • 417 N.W.2d 677
  • 1987 Minn. App. LEXIS 5144
  • 1988 WL 101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that commission acted arbitrarily because the commission’s final order “demonstrate[d] an independent and lengthy examination and explanation” of the challenged issue
  • “The legislature has provided that ‘unless the [cjommission finds that exigent circumstances exist,’ the [c]ommission should calculate an interim rate schedule in accordance with procedures set forth in the statute.”
  • “In order to obtain relief on appeal, a party must generally establish that it has been prejudiced as a result of a tribunal’s actions. This is true in administrative, as well as judicial, proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huspeni, Sedgwick, Lommen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.