Otten v. Otten

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when a party makes a motion for reconsideration, “the time for appeal from the judgment begins to run from the time of the order granting or denying the motion”
• stating that when a motion to alter or amend is made under Rule 59, “the time for appeal from the judgment begins to run from the time of the order granting or denying the motion”
• stating a motion made under Rule 60(a), SCRCP, does not toll the running of the time for appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. Condon
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-10-01· cited 62×
• Coward Hund Construction Co. v. Ball Corp.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-05-10· cited 33×
• Canal Insurance v. Caldwell
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-11-22· cited 18×
• Hudson v. Hudson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-10-07· cited 12×
• Wicker v. Anderson County Council
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-04-10· cited 1×
• Murray Properties Partnership v. L. P. Cox Co.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-07-30· cited 1×