Otis Elevator Co. v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying reconsideration because prior opinion “remains good law after” Supreme Court decision
• denying motion for reconsideration of dismissal under SLUSA, noting “Troice does not stand for the broad proposition that SLUSA cannot apply whenever the defendant accused of fraud, instead of the plaintiff, was the one who purchased the covered securities.”
• “The term ‘covered security’ includes mutual funds that are issued by a registered investment company.”
• “Troice does not stand for the broad proposition that SLUSA cannot apply whenever the defendant accused of fraud, instead of the plaintiff, was the one who purchased the covered securities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).