Otis Elevator Co. v. Embert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating the heightened standard of care owed to passengers by owners or operators of passenger elevators, although the issue in the case was whether the owner was entitled to recover, under a third party complaint, from the elevator maintenance company
• hill maintenance contract: because improperly maintained elevator is dangerous instrumentality, those who own and maintain elevator owe the plaintiff a higher standard of care

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).