Skip to main content
· 10/21/1907

Otillio v. Otillio

Citations

  • 119 La. 965
  • 44 So. 799
  • 1907 La. LEXIS 573

Syllabus

<p>1. Contempt — Trial—Subsequent Acts.</p> <p>A person brought into court on a rule for contempt cannot be called on to answer for another and a later act than the one charged, even if the later act could be considered to be a contempt of court.</p> <p>2. Divorce — Failure to Pax Alimony.</p> <p>The failure of a defendant to pay promptly the alimony which he is ordered to pay by a judgment does not carry with it a contempt of court per se and ipso facto as the result of such failure.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For eases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 17, Divorce, § 756.]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that employee agreed to arbitration clause even though it was unsigned because a signed offer letter “clearly stated that acceptance of employment and continuation of employment would be deemed to be acceptance of the agreement to arbitrate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nicholls

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.