Otay Mesa Property L.P. v. United States Department of the Interior

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that there was no localized interest justifying transfer because plaintiffs challenged a national policy that had no direct or unique impact on transferee forum
• finding that there was no localized interest justifying transfer because plaintiffs challenged a national policy that had no direct or unique impact on transferee forum
• declining to transfer case to California district where 4,000 acres of “critical habitat” resided because protection of endangered species was national concern

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).