Ota v. Samsung Electronics Co. (In Re Ota)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We conclude that absent an improper purpose or motive, an assignee or purchaser of claims has standing to object to a debtor’s discharge.”
• “We conclude that absent an improper purpose or motive, an assignee or purchaser of claims has standing to object to a debtor’s discharge.”
• defining creditor for § 727 actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).