Oswalt v. RESOLUTE INDUSTRIES, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing § 2 of the Third Restatement but declining to adopt the Third Restatement for all cases
• discussing § 2 of the Third Restatement but declining to adopt the Third Restatement for all cases
• distinguishing The Conqueror and affirming an award of business-related and nonspeculative loss-of-use damages
• “We review de novo the legal conclusion that damages are available and review for clear error factual findings underlying the damages award.”
• “‘Credibility 21 determinations, the weighing of the evidence, and the drawing of 22 legitimate inferences from the facts’ are inappropriate at the 23 24 10 The bankruptcy court found the testimony in connection with Global Automotive’s § 727(a)(4)(A
• “‘Credibility 21 determinations, the weighing of the evidence, and the drawing of 22 legitimate inferences from the facts’ are inappropriate at the 23 24 10 The bankruptcy court found the testimony in connection with Global Automotive’s § 727(a)(4)(A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).