Skip to main content
· 9/14/1993

Oswaldo Jaramillo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Executive Office for Immigration Review

Citations

  • 1 F.3d 1149
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23356
  • 1993 WL 325276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating the ALJ’s determination must be founded on “a 2 holistic review of the record”
  • under California law, unjust 2 enrichment “does not lie when an enforceable, binding agreement 3 exists defining the rights of the parties”
  • under California law, unjust 2 enrichment “does not lie when an enforceable, binding agreement 3 exists defining the rights of the parties”
  • “Contradiction with the medical record is a sufficient basis for 2 rejecting the claimant’s subjective testimony.”
  • “Specific performance is a remedy associated with breach of 2 contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Fay, Kravitch, Hatchett, Anderson, Edmondson, Cox, Birch, Dubina, Black, Carnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.