· 11/5/1992
Oswald MacHine & Equipment, Inc. v. Yip
Citations
- 10 Cal. App. 4th 1238
- 13 Cal. Rptr. 2d 193
- 18 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1196
- 92 Daily Journal DAR 15003
- 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9087
- 1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the conversion provisions relating to forged endorsements are also applicable to unauthorized endorsements
- holding that as with a forgery, when a bank pays on an instrument via an unauthorized endorsement, that bank has exercised dominion and control over the instrument inconsistent with the rights of the true owner, thus resulting in the conversion of the instrument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Werdegar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.