O'SULLIVAN v. Secretary of Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reaching merits of case, despite mootness of named plaintiffs, because defendants did not argue mootness and because counsel \apparently [were] prepared to pursue this action on behalf of [a substitute plaintiff]\
• deprivation of plaintiffs’ statutory rights would lead to violation of their persons which could not be remedied retroactively
• statutory language, when clear and unambiguous, must be given its ordinary meaning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).