Ostwald v. Beck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the jury could have inferred defendant’s knowledge of felon status based on the defendant’s stipulation that he was previously convicted of a felony coupled with a jail call in which defendant implied knowledge of his status
• stating “a limiting instruction may not always sufficiently reduce the risk that the jury will misuse” evidence and that the instruction may cure “the risk of undue prejudice in limited circumstances”
• “We have no doubt that Deen’s out-of-court statements would not be hearsay if offered merely to demonstrate their ‘effect on the listener.’” (citing FED. R. EVID. 801(c))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).