Ostrow v. Higgins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the fact that an earlier suit was dismissed as moot did not act as a bar to later suits generally concerning the transaction involved in the mooted suit
• holding that the statute did not require re-notice because \the legislature presumed that the trustee followed postponement notice requirements enunciated in the deed of trust itself\
• concluding that any error was harmless
• Noting parties to a deed of trust “can by private agreement require additional notice”
• dismissal for mootness not adjudication on merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).